IDFC First Bank Recovers ₹556 Crore Following Branch Fraud; Stock Stabilizes After 20% Dip

MUMBAI/CHANDIGARH – IDFC First Bank has successfully recovered the majority of funds linked to a ₹590 crore fraudulent transaction case at its Chandigarh branch, according to latest regulatory disclosures. While the incident triggered a sharp 20% sell-off in the bank’s shares earlier this week, rapid recovery efforts have limited the net financial impact to approximately ₹34 crore.

The Incident

On February 22, 2026, the lender disclosed unauthorized transactions involving Haryana government funds across 170 accounts. The fraud, characterized as an “internal lapse” rather than a cyber-security breach, involved 391 suspicious transfers.

In a swift response, the bank suspended four employees and appointed KPMG to conduct a forensic audit. Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Saini confirmed that ₹556 crore, plus ₹27 crore in accrued interest, was recovered within 24 hours via account liens and beneficiary offsets.

Financial and Regulatory Standing

Despite the scale of the initial report, analysts suggest the long-term impact on the bank’s balance sheet is minimal:

• Asset Exposure: The net hit of ₹34 crore represents just 0.016% of the bank’s ₹3.74 lakh crore total asset base.
• Capital Adequacy: The bank’s CET1 ratio remains stable above 14.2%, well above regulatory requirements.
• RBI Stance: Regulators have indicated no systemic risk to the banking sector, treating the event as an isolated operational failure.

Market Sentiment

The stock (IDFCFIRSTB) faced a volatile session, hitting a lower circuit of ₹67 from a pre-fraud high of ₹83. By the close of trade on February 24, the shares saw a mild recovery to ₹70.97, as investors weighed the recovery of funds against reputational risks.

Key Takeaways for Investors

• Swift Damage Control: The bank’s decision to reimburse the government upfront (₹583 Cr) before the audit’s conclusion highlights a strong “Customer First” philosophy, aimed at protecting its retail brand.
• Valuation Buffer: With the stock trading at a 1.5x Price-to-Book ratio, it is currently cheaper than major private peers (Avg 1.8x), potentially offering a margin of safety for long-term buyers.
• Operational Risk vs. Credit Risk: This was an operational failure (fraud) rather than a credit failure (bad loans). While it requires tighter internal controls, it does not change the bank’s 48% YoY profit growth trajectory.
• Monitoring Period: Investors should watch for the KPMG Forensic Report (expected in 4-6 weeks) to ensure no further “ghost accounts” are discovered.

Disclaimer

The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Investing in the stock market involves risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers are encouraged to consult with a certified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author or the publication may or may not hold positions in the securities mentioned.

Amit Sharma

As the Lead Analyst at Invest With Bull, Amit Sharma bridges the gap between complex banking regulations and your wallet. With a core focus on Credit Card Arbitrage and BDA Real Estate, Amit provides the data-backed analysis that salaried professionals need to maximize returns and minimize interest. He is dedicated to building financial literacy through unbiased, actionable research.

investwithbull.com/